Article #7: Module 6: Building Partnerships Between Social Enterprises and Contracting Authorities in Social Public Procurement

Introduction

Social Public Procurement (SPP) is increasingly seen as more than a technical purchasing procedure: it is a policy instrument that can generate measurable social value through the way public money is spent. Module 6 of the Deal4Good training programme focuses on one factor that often determines whether SPP actually delivers on that promise, effective partnerships between social enterprises and contracting authorities. The module treats collaboration as a practical capability, not an abstract ideal, and shows how structured relationships can help public buyers meet social objectives while enabling social enterprises to participate meaningfully in public markets.

At the heart of the module is the idea that both sides face real constraints. Social enterprises frequently encounter barriers to entry in public procurement, such as administrative complexity and capacity limits, while contracting authorities must reconcile social ambitions with legal requirements, transparency, and value-for-money responsibilities. Module 6 positions partnership-building as a way to reduce these frictions: social enterprises become more visible and “procurement-ready,” and contracting authorities gain clearer pathways for embedding social value into purchasing decisions in a consistent and accountable manner.

What the Module Delivers in Real Procurement Settings

Rather than aiming only at awareness, the module is designed to build applied competence. Learners are expected to understand how partnerships between social enterprises and contracting authorities can be initiated and sustained within procurement contexts, and how relevant procurement rules shape what is possible. The module also connects collaboration directly to outcomes, guiding learners to think about how social value is integrated into procurement processes and how the impact of partnership-based procurement can be assessed over time. Case-based learning is used to move from concepts to decisions that participants may face in real procurement environments.

A key element is the range of collaboration models available. The module explains that not every partnership needs to look the same: some contexts benefit from early-stage informal cooperation that builds trust and clarifies expectations, while others call for strategic, longer-term collaboration around shared goals. It also addresses consortia and networks as a way for social enterprises to combine capacities when a contract is too large or complex for a single organisation, and it highlights co-creation approaches in which public actors and social enterprises jointly define problems and shape solutions, improving relevance and innovation.

From Partnership to Delivery and Social Impact

Module 6 repeatedly stresses that partnerships only matter if they function well during implementation. For that reason, it pays attention to partnership “readiness” and governance: social enterprises need organisational and administrative capacity to engage with procurement, and contracting authorities need internal knowledge and skills to integrate social value appropriately. The module frames good governance as something concrete, clear roles, transparent decision-making, and practical coordination across the procurement lifecycle, because these elements prevent misunderstandings and help resolve inevitable tensions about resources, responsibilities, and expectations.

The learning design reflects this real-world emphasis. The module is structured into five lesson units of 45 minutes each, with total duration described as roughly four hours (and noted as 3 hours and 45 minutes in the presentation plan), and it uses interactive methods such as discussion, case work, and applied exercises rather than a formal exam. Assessment is embedded in activities that require learners to interpret scenarios, choose appropriate partnership arrangements, and connect partnership decisions to social value and impact considerations.

Conclusion

Finally, Module 6 is positioned within a broader competence pathway. It builds on foundational understanding of SPP and procurement rules and connects forward to themes like contract management and social impact monitoring, reinforcing a full-cycle view: partnerships help design and enable better procurement, and monitoring helps demonstrate that the promised social value was actually delivered. In that sense, the module’s main message is straightforward: social procurement becomes effective when collaboration is intentional, structured, and tied to outcomes that can be verified.

Bibliography

European Commission. (2018). Public procurement guidance for practitioners: On avoiding the most common errors in projects funded by the European Structural and Investment Funds. Publications Office of the European Union.

European Commission. (2021). Buying social: A guide to taking account of social considerations in public procurement (2nd ed.). Publications Office of the European Union.

European Union. (2014). Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, L 94, 28 March 2014.

ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability. (2016). The Procura+ manual: A guide to implementing sustainable procurement (3rd ed.). ICLEI Europe.

International Organization for Standardization. (2017). ISO 20400: Sustainable procurement—Guidance. ISO.

OECD. (2015). Recommendation of the Council on Public Procurement (OECD/LEGAL/0411). OECD.

OECD. (2023). Buying social with the social economy. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/c24fccd0-en

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations.